A Sussex radio station was ordered to to pay up after claiming it could not be sure a veteran news photographer had taken a picture it used online.

V2 Radio tried to argue Sussex News and Pictures’ Eddie Mitchell had not taken the picture despite being shown image metadata and his byline on another site.

The station was ordered to pay £135 damages and costs after a court found the picture was taken by Mitchell.

“It was a breach of his copyright and he is entitled to damages of the money he would have earned.

“None of this is unfamiliar to each of the parties,” District Judge Araba Obodai said.

Nicolas Cottrell of V2 Radio claimed the picture was provided by a news source in good faith.

Mitchell told the court his news picture was sent to his paying clients and posted on his own Twitter (now X) feed.

“In my role as a news photographer I was mobilised to this incident and took pictures,” he said.

“It was on my Twitter, The Argus and More Radio websites.

[Taking photos from social media: What news publishers need to know]

“I Googled it the following day to see who had used it. I found it had been on V2 and I emailed them with an invoice.

“Normally, an apology is more than enough – accidents do happen.

“I sent three emails and phoned them. I heard nothing back.”

The court heard V2 initially agreed to mediation before backing out.

Nobody from the station appeared when the case was brought to County Court in Brighton.

DJ Obodai said the case had come to the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court after the photographer and radio station were unable to resolve their issues.

The picture, taken at a road accident in the early hours of 22 November last year, was posted on the V2 site.

V2 maintained they did not believe the picture was taken by Mitchell as the road was closed.

Cottrell said there was no evidence the image was taken by Mitchell.

They also denied having any knowledge of the photographer despite admitting they had been quoted a price for his images in the past.

Cottrell said: “We published at 1050 on November 22. At 2127, we received first communication from Eddie. Within one hour, it was removed whilst we investigated.”

Asked by the court if the station accepted the picture had been taken by Eddie Mitchell, Cottrell said: “I’m not sure I can absolutely say that.

“No, I don’t accept that. I can’t categorically tell you that is the case.”

District Judge Obodai said: “What I have seen from Mr Mitchell is the metadata and on the balance of probability, I accept the photograph is his. His byline on The Argus, to my mind, is sufficient.

“The defendant says it had no knowledge of Mr Mitchell but the documentation demonstrates that is not quite the case.

“A redacted email referring to a different photograph was sent to V2 Radio.

“There is also another document from Mitchell where an inquiry was raised by the defendant wanting to use a picture which says they would have to pay for it.

“I don’t accept the defendant saying they have no knowledge of the claimant.

“The photograph is his to decide what to do with. Licences can be granted in different way and so-forth. No such request was made.

“The photograph was taken down following receipt of the email,” the judge said.

After the virtual hearing, Mitchell said: “I’m pleased with the win but it was an arduous task.

“There was always a high probability I was going to win and it was childish, pathetic to not engage in the first place.

“Even though it had my byline on it and they were shown the metadata in court. Thankfully, the judge took that.

“If they had apologised in the first place, that would have been it.”

The photographer said he would donate the money to charity.

“It’s not about the money, it’s about them sticking their head in the sand. I’m giving the money to the RNLI.”

V2 Radio were approached for comment.

The court gave the station 14 days to pay.

The post Photographer wins court copyright row with local radio website appeared first on Press Gazette.

Police charged cash for clips of the Brighton Cat Killer after he died in prison.

Sussex Police sold clips of his interviews after Steve Bouquet – known as the Brighton Cat Killer – died of cancer.

The force – known for having an eBay site which sells items confiscated from criminals – has been charging £250-a-clip for interview footage of Bouquet.

Former Royal Navy seaman Bouquet was convicted in July last year of an eight-month campaign of brutal knife attacks on cats.

The 54-year-old had killed nine cats and left seven more for dead.
He died in hospital on 6 January this year.

Interviews are routinely video taped for use in court and handed out by police either during or at the end of trials.

A documentary maker who contacted Sussex Police in July this year to source interview material was told the force were charging £250 per clip.

Clips used as evidence in court and others not played to the jury were offered for sale.

In an email quoting the price for each clip, Sussex Police said: “We only offer a single licence with the minimum cost being £250 for non-exclusive use for up to three years.

“Please let me know if you would like to purchase.”

Five neighbouring police forces said there were no circumstances in which they would sell police interviews to the press.

A spokesman for the Met police said: “We only release footage where it is being used contemporaneously as part of an appeal or where it has been entered in evidence at court.

“We don’t charge a fee for this.”

Essex police said: “It is a categoric no from us. And I’d refer you to College of Policing code of ethics for further guidance.”

Surrey police said: “We do not charge for supplying video to the press.”

Kent police said they were not aware of any instances where they have charged the press for any videos.

Hampshire police said: “As a Force we would not charge a fee for this in any circumstance.”

A spokesman for Sussex Police said: “On a day to day basis we supply the media with a great deal of information and materials about policing issues, operations and investigations and which is freely used for contemporaneous reporting.

“We support the principles of open justice and the wider benefits to our local communities of sharing this information, legally and proportionately, for the prevention and detection of crime, and building confidence in reporting.

“In this case, evidential material used in court was supplied to all media freely for use at the time.

“For requests to use non-contemporaneous material, and where its judged there is no further policing purpose, we may seek a fee for administrative time so as not to burden the tax payer.

“This is common practice and accepted within the production industry.”

The post Sussex Police charges filmmaker £250 for clips of Brighton Cat Killer appeared first on Press Gazette.